“GAY RIGHTS” vs. the rights of children:

Alana Newman, who is NOT in any way against homosexuals, is the daughter of a sperm-donor-conception arrangement. She has become an activist working to fight against third-party reproduction arrangements (sperm banking and surrogacy) because she — along with thousands of other donor-conceived people documented in a massive 2010 study — believes quite lucidly that it violates children’s rights to treat them like commodities and sever their bonds to their father and mother. . . .

As we learn from this horrendous article that came out in Yahoo News, reporters will call people anti-gay even if they are critiquing anything tied to sperm banking or surrogacy at all . . .

The movement for same-sex marriage is the movement for same-sex parenting, and the movement for same-sex parenting is a merciless push to turn children into property designed for adult consumer demands. Why else would people call someone anti-gay merely for saying we shouldn’t treat children like property or deny them their father or mother? You can’t keep ligbitist [LGBT-ist] activists happy unless you go all the way and say, “fine, I’m totally okay with you buying and selling children and bringing chattel slavery back to the United States; I’ll call it by some euphemism like ‘new families’ and sing your praises forever!”